Comparison

Opa‘s Weißer vs Slow cooked pork with a miso maple glaze

Overall, Slow cooked pork with a miso maple glaze has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientOpa‘s WeißerSlow cooked pork with a miso...
Nutri-Score d d
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 305 kcal 288 kcal
Fat 26 g 14.9 g
Saturated fat 7.3 g 3.9 g
Sugars 0.5 g 2.8 g
Salt 1.2 g 1.1 g
Fiber 0 g 0.2 g
Protein 16 g 33 g
Additives10
AllergensNone listedGluten, Soybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Slow cooked pork with a miso maple glaze has 43% less fat (14.9 g vs 26 g).
  • Slow cooked pork with a miso maple glaze has 47% less saturated fat (3.9 g vs 7.3 g).
  • Opa‘s Weißer has 82% less sugar (0.5 g vs 2.8 g).
  • Slow cooked pork with a miso maple glaze has 52% more protein (33 g vs 16 g).
  • Only Slow cooked pork with a miso maple glaze lists: Gluten, Soybeans.

Ingredients

Opa‘s Weißer

93% Schweinefleisch, Trinkwasser, Nitritpökelsalz (Speisesalz Konservierungsstoff: Natriumnitrit) Gewürze, Stabilisator: Diphosphate

Slow cooked pork with a miso maple glaze

Pork shoulder (80%), water, glucose syrup, fermented red chilli, sugar, fermented broad beans, rice wine vinegar, fermented soya bean, maple syrup, salt, soya bean, diced onion, sunflower oil, cornflour, red miso (soya beans, sugar, water, salt, wheat), garlic, brown sugar, ginger purée, mirin.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Opa‘s Weißer or Slow cooked pork with a miso maple glaze?

Overall, Slow cooked pork with a miso maple glaze has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Slow cooked pork with a miso maple glaze has fewer calories: 288 kcal versus 305 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Opa‘s Weißer has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 2.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons