Comparison
Quinoa Flakes vs Quinoaflocken
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Quinoa Flakes | Quinoaflocken |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 375 kcal | 348 kcal |
| Fat | 5 g | 5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.7 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 12.5 g | 1.8 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 7.5 g | 6.6 g |
| Protein | 15 g | 14 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Quinoaflocken has 86% less sugar (1.8 g vs 12.5 g).
- Quinoa Flakes has 12% more fiber (7.5 g vs 6.6 g).
Ingredients
Quinoa Flakes
Organic White Quinoa Flakes
Quinoaflocken
Quinoa
FAQ
Which is healthier: Quinoa Flakes or Quinoaflocken?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Quinoaflocken has fewer calories: 348 kcal versus 375 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Quinoaflocken has less sugar: 1.8 g versus 12.5 g per 100 g.