Quark-Traum vs Yaourt framboise
Overall, Quark-Traum has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Quark-Traum | Yaourt framboise |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | c |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 81 kcal | 90 kcal |
| Fat | 0.2 g | 2.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 1.7 g |
| Sugars | 11.9 g | 12 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0.4 g | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 7.4 g | 3.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Quark-Traum has 10% fewer calories (81 kcal vs 90 kcal).
- Quark-Traum has 93% less fat (0.2 g vs 2.9 g).
- Quark-Traum has 94% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 1.7 g).
- Quark-Traum has 51% more protein (7.4 g vs 3.6 g).
- Quark-Traum has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Yaourt framboise lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Quark-Traum
170330948 LODL Nährwerte/Valeurs nutritionnelles moyennes/ Valori nutrizionali medi Energie/Energie/Energia Fett/Matières grasses/Grassi davon gesättigte Fettsäuren/dont acides gras saturés/di cui acidi grassi saturi Kohlenhydrate/Glucides/Carboidrati davon Zucker/dont sucres/ di cui zuccheri Eiweiss/Protéines/Proteine Salz/Sel/Sale /100 g 363 kJ/
Yaourt framboise
yogourt au _lait_ entier (_lait_ entier** , _lait_ écrémé en poudre**, protéine du _lait_**), sucre de canne brut* 7,5%, framboises* 7,5%, amidon de maïs*, concentré de jus de sureau colorant*, arôme naturel, concentré de jus de citron*.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Quark-Traum or Yaourt framboise?
Overall, Quark-Traum has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Quark-Traum has fewer calories: 81 kcal versus 90 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Quark-Traum has less sugar: 11.9 g versus 12 g per 100 g.