Pz sce tom cuis nat 400g f12 vs Polpa Rustica di Pomodoro
Overall, Polpa Rustica di Pomodoro has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pz sce tom cuis nat 400g f12 | Polpa Rustica di Pomodoro |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | 1 |
| Calories | 58 kcal | 25 kcal |
| Fat | 2 g | 0.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 6.3 g | 2.8 g |
| Salt | 0.9 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1.3 g | 1.3 g |
| Protein | 1.5 g | 1.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Polpa Rustica di Pomodoro has 57% fewer calories (25 kcal vs 58 kcal).
- Polpa Rustica di Pomodoro has 90% less fat (0.2 g vs 2 g).
- Polpa Rustica di Pomodoro has 56% less sugar (2.8 g vs 6.3 g).
- Polpa Rustica di Pomodoro has 98% less salt (0 g vs 0.9 g).
- Pz sce tom cuis nat 400g f12 has 20% more protein (1.5 g vs 1.2 g).
- Polpa Rustica di Pomodoro is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Pz sce tom cuis nat 400g f12
Pulpe de tomates fraîches avec morceaux et purées de tomates fraîches 82%, oignons 9%, carottes 3,5%, huile d'olive vierge, sucre, sel, amidon, plantes aromatiques (dont persil 0,1%), extrait de légumes, ail frais, arôme naturel de laurier.
Polpa Rustica di Pomodoro
Pomodoro
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pz sce tom cuis nat 400g f12 or Polpa Rustica di Pomodoro?
Overall, Polpa Rustica di Pomodoro has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Polpa Rustica di Pomodoro has fewer calories: 25 kcal versus 58 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Polpa Rustica di Pomodoro has less sugar: 2.8 g versus 6.3 g per 100 g.