Comparison

Putenbrustfilet vs Bergsalami

Overall, Putenbrustfilet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPutenbrustfiletBergsalami
Nutri-Score d e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 106 kcal 377 kcal
Fat 2 g 32.5 g
Saturated fat 0.6 g 13.6 g
Sugars 1 g 1 g
Salt 2.2 g 3.4 g
Protein 21 g 20 g
Additives33
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Putenbrustfilet has 72% fewer calories (106 kcal vs 377 kcal).
  • Putenbrustfilet has 94% less fat (2 g vs 32.5 g).
  • Putenbrustfilet has 96% less saturated fat (0.6 g vs 13.6 g).
  • Putenbrustfilet has 36% less salt (2.2 g vs 3.4 g).
  • Putenbrustfilet has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Putenbrustfilet

Putenbrustfilet', jodiertes Speisesalz (Speisesalz, Kaliumjodat), Dextrose, Gewürzextrakte (Knoblauch, Ingwer, Lorbeer, Pfeffer, Piment, Wacholder, Zitrone), Stabilisator: Triphosphate; Antioxidationsmittel: Natriumascorbat; Konservierungsstoff: Natriumnitrit; Rapsöl. Kann Spuren von Senf und Sellerie enthalten.

Bergsalami

Schweinefleisch, Speck, jodiertes Speisesalz (Speisesalz, Kaliumjodat), Gewürze (weißer Pfeffer, Koriander), Gewürzextrakte (Muskatnuss-, Majoran-, Liebstöckel-, Zwiebel-, Bockshornklee-, Knoblauch-, Paprikaextrakt), Dextrose, Antioxidationsmittel: Natriumascorbat, Konservierungsstoff: Natriumnitrit, Stabilisator: Diphosphate, Buchenholzrauch. Kann Spuren von Senf und Sellerie enthalten.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Putenbrustfilet or Bergsalami?

Overall, Putenbrustfilet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Putenbrustfilet has fewer calories: 106 kcal versus 377 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Putenbrustfilet has less sugar: 1 g versus 1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons