Putenbrustfilet vs Kabanos to go - Classic
Overall, Putenbrustfilet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Putenbrustfilet | Kabanos to go - Classic |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 106 kcal | 520 kcal |
| Fat | 2 g | 44 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.6 g | 17 g |
| Sugars | 1 g | 1.8 g |
| Salt | 2.2 g | 3.1 g |
| Protein | 21 g | 26 g |
| Additives | 3 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Putenbrustfilet has 80% fewer calories (106 kcal vs 520 kcal).
- Putenbrustfilet has 95% less fat (2 g vs 44 g).
- Putenbrustfilet has 96% less saturated fat (0.6 g vs 17 g).
- Putenbrustfilet has 44% less sugar (1 g vs 1.8 g).
- Putenbrustfilet has 28% less salt (2.2 g vs 3.1 g).
- Kabanos to go - Classic has 19% more protein (26 g vs 21 g).
- Putenbrustfilet has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Putenbrustfilet
Putenbrustfilet', jodiertes Speisesalz (Speisesalz, Kaliumjodat), Dextrose, Gewürzextrakte (Knoblauch, Ingwer, Lorbeer, Pfeffer, Piment, Wacholder, Zitrone), Stabilisator: Triphosphate; Antioxidationsmittel: Natriumascorbat; Konservierungsstoff: Natriumnitrit; Rapsöl. Kann Spuren von Senf und Sellerie enthalten.
Kabanos to go - Classic
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Putenbrustfilet or Kabanos to go - Classic?
Overall, Putenbrustfilet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Putenbrustfilet has fewer calories: 106 kcal versus 520 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Putenbrustfilet has less sugar: 1 g versus 1.8 g per 100 g.