Bergsalami vs Kabanos to go - Classic
Overall, Bergsalami has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Bergsalami | Kabanos to go - Classic |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 377 kcal | 520 kcal |
| Fat | 32.5 g | 44 g |
| Saturated fat | 13.6 g | 17 g |
| Sugars | 1 g | 1.8 g |
| Salt | 3.4 g | 3.1 g |
| Protein | 20 g | 26 g |
| Additives | 3 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Bergsalami has 28% fewer calories (377 kcal vs 520 kcal).
- Bergsalami has 26% less fat (32.5 g vs 44 g).
- Bergsalami has 20% less saturated fat (13.6 g vs 17 g).
- Bergsalami has 44% less sugar (1 g vs 1.8 g).
- Kabanos to go - Classic has 11% less salt (3.1 g vs 3.4 g).
- Kabanos to go - Classic has 23% more protein (26 g vs 20 g).
Ingredients
Bergsalami
Schweinefleisch, Speck, jodiertes Speisesalz (Speisesalz, Kaliumjodat), Gewürze (weißer Pfeffer, Koriander), Gewürzextrakte (Muskatnuss-, Majoran-, Liebstöckel-, Zwiebel-, Bockshornklee-, Knoblauch-, Paprikaextrakt), Dextrose, Antioxidationsmittel: Natriumascorbat, Konservierungsstoff: Natriumnitrit, Stabilisator: Diphosphate, Buchenholzrauch. Kann Spuren von Senf und Sellerie enthalten.
Kabanos to go - Classic
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bergsalami or Kabanos to go - Classic?
Overall, Bergsalami has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Bergsalami has fewer calories: 377 kcal versus 520 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bergsalami has less sugar: 1 g versus 1.8 g per 100 g.