Puck vs Vach
Overall, Vach has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Puck | Vach |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 280 kcal | 253 kcal |
| Fat | 27 g | 20.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 18 g | 13.9 g |
| Sugars | 1.5 g | 3 g |
| Salt | 1.7 g | 5.7 g |
| Protein | 6 g | 14.5 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Vach has 24% less fat (20.5 g vs 27 g).
- Vach has 23% less saturated fat (13.9 g vs 18 g).
- Puck has 50% less sugar (1.5 g vs 3 g).
- Puck has 70% less salt (1.7 g vs 5.7 g).
- Vach has 59% more protein (14.5 g vs 6 g).
Ingredients
Puck
Cheese, Palm oil, Starter culture, Salt, Emulsifier salt (E339). No rennet added. Contains milk.
Vach
جبنة مذوبة للدهين, مواد دهنية مصدرها الحليب, بروتينات الحليب, أملاح استحلاب, أملاح معدنية, ملح, زبدة, مركزات بروتينات الحليب, كالسيوم, فيتامين د
FAQ
Which is healthier: Puck or Vach?
Overall, Vach has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Vach has fewer calories: 253 kcal versus 280 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Puck has less sugar: 1.5 g versus 3 g per 100 g.