Pringles Original vs Horno Al punto de sal
Overall, Horno Al punto de sal has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pringles Original | Horno Al punto de sal |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 528 kcal | 442 kcal |
| Fat | 31 g | 13 g |
| Saturated fat | 3 g | 1.4 g |
| Sugars | 0.9 g | 5.3 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | 4.1 g | 6.2 g |
| Protein | 6.2 g | 5.9 g |
| Additives | 3 | 3 |
| Allergens | Gluten | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Horno Al punto de sal has 16% fewer calories (442 kcal vs 528 kcal).
- Horno Al punto de sal has 58% less fat (13 g vs 31 g).
- Horno Al punto de sal has 53% less saturated fat (1.4 g vs 3 g).
- Pringles Original has 83% less sugar (0.9 g vs 5.3 g).
- Horno Al punto de sal has 34% more fiber (6.2 g vs 4.1 g).
- Horno Al punto de sal has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Pringles Original lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Pringles Original
Pommes de terre déshydratées, huiles végétales (tournesol, palme, mais) en proportion variable, farine de blé, farine de mais, farine de riz, maltodextrine, émulsifiant (E471), sel, colorant (norbixine de rocou).
Horno Al punto de sal
Copos de patata (65%), almidón, aceite de girasol, azúcar, aroma a sal marina [sal marina (0,5%), sal (0,3%), aromas], emulgente (lecitina de girasol), colorante (norbixina de bija).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pringles Original or Horno Al punto de sal?
Overall, Horno Al punto de sal has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Horno Al punto de sal has fewer calories: 442 kcal versus 528 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pringles Original has less sugar: 0.9 g versus 5.3 g per 100 g.