Cuites au four nature vs Pringles Original
Overall, Cuites au four nature has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Cuites au four nature | Pringles Original |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 442 kcal | 528 kcal |
| Fat | 13 g | 31 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.4 g | 3 g |
| Sugars | 5.3 g | 0.9 g |
| Salt | 0.8 g | 1 g |
| Fiber | 6.2 g | 4.1 g |
| Protein | 5.9 g | 6.2 g |
| Additives | 4 | 3 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cuites au four nature has 16% fewer calories (442 kcal vs 528 kcal).
- Cuites au four nature has 58% less fat (13 g vs 31 g).
- Cuites au four nature has 53% less saturated fat (1.4 g vs 3 g).
- Pringles Original has 83% less sugar (0.9 g vs 5.3 g).
- Cuites au four nature has 34% more fiber (6.2 g vs 4.1 g).
- Cuites au four nature has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Pringles Original lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Cuites au four nature
Flocons de pommes de terre (65%),amidon,huile de tournesol,sucre,base aromatisante sel de mer (sel de mer, arômes),émulsifiant (lécithine de tournesol),colorant (norbixine de rocou)
Pringles Original
Pommes de terre déshydratées, huiles végétales (tournesol, palme, mais) en proportion variable, farine de blé, farine de mais, farine de riz, maltodextrine, émulsifiant (E471), sel, colorant (norbixine de rocou).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Cuites au four nature or Pringles Original?
Overall, Cuites au four nature has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Cuites au four nature has fewer calories: 442 kcal versus 528 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pringles Original has less sugar: 0.9 g versus 5.3 g per 100 g.