Comparison

Pousses de haricots mungo - Boîte 180g vs Pousse de haricot mungo

Overall, Pousse de haricot mungo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPousses de haricots mungo -...Pousse de haricot mungo
Nutri-Score b b
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 21 kcal 32 kcal
Fat 0.5 g 0 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0 g
Sugars 1.8 g 2 g
Salt 0.4 g 0.5 g
Fiber 1.6 g 1.2 g
Protein 1.6 g 3 g
Additives22
AllergensSulphur dioxide and sulphitesNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Pousses de haricots mungo - Boîte 180g has 34% fewer calories (21 kcal vs 32 kcal).
  • Pousse de haricot mungo has no fat, while Pousses de haricots mungo - Boîte 180g has 0.5 g.
  • Pousses de haricots mungo - Boîte 180g has 25% more fiber (1.6 g vs 1.2 g).
  • Pousse de haricot mungo has 47% more protein (3 g vs 1.6 g).
  • Pousse de haricot mungo is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Pousses de haricots mungo - Boîte 180g lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.

Ingredients

Pousses de haricots mungo - Boîte 180g

Eau, pousses de haricots mungo, sucre, vinaigre de vin blanc, sel, acidifiant : acide citrique, antioxydant : acide ascorbique, arôme naturel.

Pousse de haricot mungo

Pousses de haricot mungo, eau, sucre, sel, jus de citron concentré, acidifiant: acide citrique, antioxydant: acide ascorbique.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Pousses de haricots mungo - Boîte 180g or Pousse de haricot mungo?

Overall, Pousse de haricot mungo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Pousses de haricots mungo - Boîte 180g has fewer calories: 21 kcal versus 32 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Pousses de haricots mungo - Boîte 180g has less sugar: 1.8 g versus 2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons