Pommes de terre vs Patatas paja
Overall, Pommes de terre has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pommes de terre | Patatas paja |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 62 kcal | 545 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 34 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 2.9 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.5 g | 1.1 g |
| Fiber | 1.5 g | 3.8 g |
| Protein | 1.4 g | 6.9 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pommes de terre has 89% fewer calories (62 kcal vs 545 kcal).
- Pommes de terre has 99% less fat (0.5 g vs 34 g).
- Pommes de terre has no saturated fat, while Patatas paja has 2.9 g.
- Patatas paja has no sugar, while Pommes de terre has 0.5 g.
- Pommes de terre has 55% less salt (0.5 g vs 1.1 g).
- Patatas paja has 61% more fiber (3.8 g vs 1.5 g).
- Patatas paja has 80% more protein (6.9 g vs 1.4 g).
- Pommes de terre has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Pommes de terre
Pommes de terre, eau, sel, antioxydant : acide ascorbique.
Patatas paja
Patatas, aceite de girasol, sal.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pommes de terre or Patatas paja?
Overall, Pommes de terre has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pommes de terre has fewer calories: 62 kcal versus 545 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Patatas paja has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.