Comparison

Pommes de terre en cubes vs Patatas paja

Overall, Pommes de terre en cubes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPommes de terre en cubesPatatas paja
Nutri-Score a d
NOVA group 1 3
Calories 75 kcal 545 kcal
Fat 0.3 g 34 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 2.9 g
Sugars 0.5 g 0 g
Salt 0.1 g 1.1 g
Fiber — 3.8 g
Protein 2 g 6.9 g
Additives10
AllergensSulphur dioxide and sulphites, Disulfite de sodiumNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Pommes de terre en cubes has 86% fewer calories (75 kcal vs 545 kcal).
  • Pommes de terre en cubes has 99% less fat (0.3 g vs 34 g).
  • Pommes de terre en cubes has 97% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 2.9 g).
  • Patatas paja has no sugar, while Pommes de terre en cubes has 0.5 g.
  • Pommes de terre en cubes has 91% less salt (0.1 g vs 1.1 g).
  • Patatas paja has 71% more protein (6.9 g vs 2 g).
  • Pommes de terre en cubes has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Pommes de terre en cubes is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Pommes de terre en cubes lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites, Disulfite de sodium.

Ingredients

Pommes de terre en cubes

Pommes de terre, antioxydant : _Disulfite de sodium_.

Patatas paja

Patatas, aceite de girasol, sal.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Pommes de terre en cubes or Patatas paja?

Overall, Pommes de terre en cubes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Pommes de terre en cubes has fewer calories: 75 kcal versus 545 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Patatas paja has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons