Pommes de terre en cubes vs Patatas paja
Overall, Pommes de terre en cubes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pommes de terre en cubes | Patatas paja |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | d |
| NOVA group | 1 | 3 |
| Calories | 75 kcal | 545 kcal |
| Fat | 0.3 g | 34 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 2.9 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 1.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 3.8 g |
| Protein | 2 g | 6.9 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites, Disulfite de sodium | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pommes de terre en cubes has 86% fewer calories (75 kcal vs 545 kcal).
- Pommes de terre en cubes has 99% less fat (0.3 g vs 34 g).
- Pommes de terre en cubes has 97% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 2.9 g).
- Patatas paja has no sugar, while Pommes de terre en cubes has 0.5 g.
- Pommes de terre en cubes has 91% less salt (0.1 g vs 1.1 g).
- Patatas paja has 71% more protein (6.9 g vs 2 g).
- Pommes de terre en cubes has the better Nutri-Score.
- Pommes de terre en cubes is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Pommes de terre en cubes lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites, Disulfite de sodium.
Ingredients
Pommes de terre en cubes
Pommes de terre, antioxydant : _Disulfite de sodium_.
Patatas paja
Patatas, aceite de girasol, sal.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pommes de terre en cubes or Patatas paja?
Overall, Pommes de terre en cubes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pommes de terre en cubes has fewer calories: 75 kcal versus 545 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Patatas paja has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.