Comparison

Pommes de terre en cubes vs Pdt grenaille

Overall, Pommes de terre en cubes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPommes de terre en cubesPdt grenaille
Nutri-Score a c
NOVA group 1 3
Calories 75 kcal 121 kcal
Fat 0.3 g 4.4 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 0.4 g
Sugars 0.5 g 2.1 g
Salt 0.1 g 0.8 g
Fiber — 2.3 g
Protein 2 g 2.2 g
Additives10
AllergensSulphur dioxide and sulphites, Disulfite de sodiumNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Pommes de terre en cubes has 38% fewer calories (75 kcal vs 121 kcal).
  • Pommes de terre en cubes has 93% less fat (0.3 g vs 4.4 g).
  • Pommes de terre en cubes has 75% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 0.4 g).
  • Pommes de terre en cubes has 76% less sugar (0.5 g vs 2.1 g).
  • Pommes de terre en cubes has 87% less salt (0.1 g vs 0.8 g).
  • Pommes de terre en cubes has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Pommes de terre en cubes is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Pommes de terre en cubes lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites, Disulfite de sodium.

Ingredients

Pommes de terre en cubes

Pommes de terre, antioxydant : _Disulfite de sodium_.

Pdt grenaille

Pommes de terre grenaille 90%, ail en chemise 4%, huile de Nos tournesol, sel, ail, thym, huile d'olive vierge extra, persil, poivre. Traces éventuelles de poissons, œufs, céréales contenant du gluten, amandes et lait et dérivés. &

FAQ

Which is healthier: Pommes de terre en cubes or Pdt grenaille?

Overall, Pommes de terre en cubes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Pommes de terre en cubes has fewer calories: 75 kcal versus 121 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Pommes de terre en cubes has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 2.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons