Pommes de terre vs Baby Hasselbacks
Overall, Baby Hasselbacks has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pommes de terre | Baby Hasselbacks |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 149 kcal | 106 kcal |
| Fat | 5.4 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.7 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 8.8 g | 2.9 g |
| Protein | 2.4 g | 2.9 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Baby Hasselbacks has 29% fewer calories (106 kcal vs 149 kcal).
- Baby Hasselbacks has 91% less fat (0.5 g vs 5.4 g).
- Baby Hasselbacks has 86% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 0.7 g).
- Pommes de terre has no sugar, while Baby Hasselbacks has 0.5 g.
- Pommes de terre has 67% more fiber (8.8 g vs 2.9 g).
- Baby Hasselbacks has 17% more protein (2.9 g vs 2.4 g).
- Baby Hasselbacks is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Pommes de terre
Flocons de pomme de terre réhydratés 84%, huile de tournesol, farine de riz, pomme de terre déshydratée, sel, stabilisant : hydroxypropylméthylcellulose, dextrose, épices.
Baby Hasselbacks
Potatoes 99%, Vegetable Oils (Rapeseed, Sunflower), Sachet (Sea Salt 0.2%, Cracked Black Peppercorn 0.09%, Red Pepper, Cracked Green Peppercorn, Pimento).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pommes de terre or Baby Hasselbacks?
Overall, Baby Hasselbacks has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Baby Hasselbacks has fewer calories: 106 kcal versus 149 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pommes de terre has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.