Pommes de terre coupees a l'ancienn vs Baby Hasselbacks
Overall, Baby Hasselbacks has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pommes de terre coupees a l'... | Baby Hasselbacks |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 132 kcal | 106 kcal |
| Fat | 3.3 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 1.7 g | 2.9 g |
| Protein | 2.7 g | 2.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Baby Hasselbacks has 20% fewer calories (106 kcal vs 132 kcal).
- Baby Hasselbacks has 85% less fat (0.5 g vs 3.3 g).
- Baby Hasselbacks has 41% more fiber (2.9 g vs 1.7 g).
- Baby Hasselbacks is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Pommes de terre coupees a l'ancienn
Pommes de terre 96%, huile de colza 4%, dextrose.
Baby Hasselbacks
Potatoes 99%, Vegetable Oils (Rapeseed, Sunflower), Sachet (Sea Salt 0.2%, Cracked Black Peppercorn 0.09%, Red Pepper, Cracked Green Peppercorn, Pimento).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pommes de terre coupees a l'ancienn or Baby Hasselbacks?
Overall, Baby Hasselbacks has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Baby Hasselbacks has fewer calories: 106 kcal versus 132 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pommes de terre coupees a l'ancienn has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.