Pommes de terre coupees a l'ancienn vs Jackets Slow Baked
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pommes de terre coupees a l'... | Jackets Slow Baked |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 132 kcal | 78 kcal |
| Fat | 3.3 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 1.7 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1.7 g | 2.1 g |
| Protein | 2.7 g | 1.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Jackets Slow Baked has 41% fewer calories (78 kcal vs 132 kcal).
- Jackets Slow Baked has 85% less fat (0.5 g vs 3.3 g).
- Pommes de terre coupees a l'ancienn has 70% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1.7 g).
- Jackets Slow Baked has 19% more fiber (2.1 g vs 1.7 g).
- Pommes de terre coupees a l'ancienn has 33% more protein (2.7 g vs 1.8 g).
- Pommes de terre coupees a l'ancienn has the better Nutri-Score.
- Jackets Slow Baked is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Pommes de terre coupees a l'ancienn
Pommes de terre 96%, huile de colza 4%, dextrose.
Jackets Slow Baked
Potatoes 99.5%, Sunflower Oil 0.5%.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pommes de terre coupees a l'ancienn or Jackets Slow Baked?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Jackets Slow Baked has fewer calories: 78 kcal versus 132 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pommes de terre coupees a l'ancienn has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1.7 g per 100 g.