Comparison

Jackets Slow Baked vs Baby Hasselbacks

Overall, Baby Hasselbacks has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientJackets Slow BakedBaby Hasselbacks
Nutri-Score b a
NOVA group 3 3
Calories 78 kcal 106 kcal
Fat 0.5 g 0.5 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 0.1 g
Sugars 1.7 g 0.5 g
Salt 0 g 0.1 g
Fiber 2.1 g 2.9 g
Protein 1.8 g 2.9 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Jackets Slow Baked has 27% fewer calories (78 kcal vs 106 kcal).
  • Baby Hasselbacks has 70% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1.7 g).
  • Baby Hasselbacks has 28% more fiber (2.9 g vs 2.1 g).
  • Baby Hasselbacks has 38% more protein (2.9 g vs 1.8 g).
  • Baby Hasselbacks has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Jackets Slow Baked

Potatoes 99.5%, Sunflower Oil 0.5%.

Baby Hasselbacks

Potatoes 99%, Vegetable Oils (Rapeseed, Sunflower), Sachet (Sea Salt 0.2%, Cracked Black Peppercorn 0.09%, Red Pepper, Cracked Green Peppercorn, Pimento).

FAQ

Which is healthier: Jackets Slow Baked or Baby Hasselbacks?

Overall, Baby Hasselbacks has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Jackets Slow Baked has fewer calories: 78 kcal versus 106 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Baby Hasselbacks has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1.7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons