Pomme de terre sud ouest à l'échirlète vs Food service quality
Overall, Food service quality has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Pomme de terre sud ouest à l'échirlète
Food service quality
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pomme de terre sud ouest à l... | Food service quality |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 165 kcal | 154 kcal |
| Fat | 8.5 g | 4.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.1 g | 2.3 g |
| Sugars | 1.7 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0.5 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | 2.7 g | 2.5 g |
| Protein | 3 g | 2.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 6 |
| Allergens | None listed | Celery, Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Food service quality has 47% less fat (4.5 g vs 8.5 g).
- Food service quality has 71% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1.7 g).
- Pomme de terre sud ouest à l'échirlète has 30% more protein (3 g vs 2.1 g).
- Only Food service quality lists: Celery, Milk.
Ingredients
Pomme de terre sud ouest à l'échirlète
Pommes de terre préfrites 84 % (pommes de terre, huile de tournesol), eau, graisse de canard 6 %, ail 1.5 %, arôme naturel, sel, poivre. Traces de céleri, gluten, fruits à coque, lait et soja.
Food service quality
Pommes de terre, huile de palme, amidon modifié de pommes de terre, farine de riz, sel, amidon modifié de tapioca, ail _lactose_ (_lait_), persil, dextrose, poudres à lever (E450i, E500i), arôme naturel, épice, épaississant E415 , _céleri_.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pomme de terre sud ouest à l'échirlète or Food service quality?
Overall, Food service quality has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Food service quality has fewer calories: 154 kcal versus 165 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Food service quality has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1.7 g per 100 g.