Pomme Coing d'Aquitaine vs Compote pomme coing
Overall, Compote pomme coing has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pomme Coing d'Aquitaine | Compote pomme coing |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 1 |
| Calories | 83 kcal | 43 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 16 g | 10 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 1.5 g |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Compote pomme coing has 48% fewer calories (43 kcal vs 83 kcal).
- Compote pomme coing has 38% less sugar (10 g vs 16 g).
- Compote pomme coing is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Pomme Coing d'Aquitaine
Pommes d'Aquitaine 46%, coings d'Aquitaine 46%, sucre, jus de citron concentré.
Compote pomme coing
Purée de pommes* 71,9 %, purée de coings* 28 %, acide ascorbique.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pomme Coing d'Aquitaine or Compote pomme coing?
Overall, Compote pomme coing has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Compote pomme coing has fewer calories: 43 kcal versus 83 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Compote pomme coing has less sugar: 10 g versus 16 g per 100 g.