Compote pomme coing vs Compote pomme coing
Overall, Compote pomme coing has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Compote pomme coing | Compote pomme coing |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | a |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 50 kcal | 43 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 9.7 g | 10 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 2.3 g | 1.5 g |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Compote pomme coing has 14% fewer calories (43 kcal vs 50 kcal).
- Compote pomme coing has 37% more fiber (2.3 g vs 1.5 g).
- Compote pomme coing has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Compote pomme coing
ülgrédients Purée de pommes 72 0%, purée de coings 28 0%, antioxydant : acide ascorbique. Sans gluten. conseroatim
Compote pomme coing
Purée de pommes* 71,9 %, purée de coings* 28 %, acide ascorbique.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Compote pomme coing or Compote pomme coing?
Overall, Compote pomme coing has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Compote pomme coing has fewer calories: 43 kcal versus 50 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Compote pomme coing has less sugar: 9.7 g versus 10 g per 100 g.