Comparison

Pollen de fleurs en pelote vs Trésor de la ruche

Overall, Trésor de la ruche has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPollen de fleurs en peloteTrésor de la ruche
Nutri-Score d a
NOVA group 1 3
Calories 394 kcal 0 kcal
Fat 7 g 0 g
Saturated fat 1.5 g 0 g
Sugars 41.6 g 0 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 11.5 g —
Protein 22.8 g 0 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedGluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Trésor de la ruche has no calories, while Pollen de fleurs en pelote has 394 kcal.
  • Trésor de la ruche has no fat, while Pollen de fleurs en pelote has 7 g.
  • Trésor de la ruche has no saturated fat, while Pollen de fleurs en pelote has 1.5 g.
  • Trésor de la ruche has no sugar, while Pollen de fleurs en pelote has 41.6 g.
  • Pollen de fleurs en pelote has 100% more protein (22.8 g vs 0 g).
  • Trésor de la ruche has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Pollen de fleurs en pelote is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Trésor de la ruche lists: Gluten.

Ingredients

Pollen de fleurs en pelote

Pollen de fleurs.

Trésor de la ruche

Eau - Gelée royale** - Sirop de blé** - Miel** - Jus concentré d'orange** (Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck). *Conformément à la Charte Apiculture Responsable. **Ingrédients d'origine agricole obtenus selon le mode production biologique.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Pollen de fleurs en pelote or Trésor de la ruche?

Overall, Trésor de la ruche has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Trésor de la ruche has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 394 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Trésor de la ruche has less sugar: 0 g versus 41.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons