Comparison

Trésor de la ruche vs Tonic' Gel Coup de Boost

Overall, Trésor de la ruche has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientTrésor de la rucheTonic' Gel Coup de Boost
Nutri-Score a e
NOVA group 3 3
Calories 0 kcal 307 kcal
Fat 0 g 1 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0 g
Sugars 0 g 65.7 g
Salt 0 g 1 g
Fiber — 0 g
Protein 0 g 1 g
Additives00
AllergensGlutenNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Trésor de la ruche has no calories, while Tonic' Gel Coup de Boost has 307 kcal.
  • Trésor de la ruche has no fat, while Tonic' Gel Coup de Boost has 1 g.
  • Trésor de la ruche has no sugar, while Tonic' Gel Coup de Boost has 65.7 g.
  • Trésor de la ruche has no salt, while Tonic' Gel Coup de Boost has 1 g.
  • Tonic' Gel Coup de Boost has 100% more protein (1 g vs 0 g).
  • Trésor de la ruche has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Trésor de la ruche lists: Gluten.

Ingredients

Trésor de la ruche

Eau - Gelée royale** - Sirop de blé** - Miel** - Jus concentré d'orange** (Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck). *Conformément à la Charte Apiculture Responsable. **Ingrédients d'origine agricole obtenus selon le mode production biologique.

Tonic' Gel Coup de Boost

Miel acacia* 73,25 %, Glycérophosphate de magnesium 6,05 % (contient 12,5 % de magnésium), Jus de citron* 16,04%, Guarana extrait concentré 1 % (contient 11 % de caféine), Huile essentielle de pamplemousse 0,30 %.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Trésor de la ruche or Tonic' Gel Coup de Boost?

Overall, Trésor de la ruche has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Trésor de la ruche has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 307 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Trésor de la ruche has less sugar: 0 g versus 65.7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons