Trésor de la ruche vs Pollen biologique
Overall, Trésor de la ruche has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Trésor de la ruche | Pollen biologique |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 0 kcal | 356 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 1.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 23 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 25 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Trésor de la ruche has no calories, while Pollen biologique has 356 kcal.
- Trésor de la ruche has no fat, while Pollen biologique has 1.3 g.
- Trésor de la ruche has no saturated fat, while Pollen biologique has 0.3 g.
- Trésor de la ruche has no sugar, while Pollen biologique has 23 g.
- Pollen biologique has 100% more protein (25 g vs 0 g).
- Trésor de la ruche has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Trésor de la ruche lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Trésor de la ruche
Eau - Gelée royale** - Sirop de blé** - Miel** - Jus concentré d'orange** (Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck). *Conformément à la Charte Apiculture Responsable. **Ingrédients d'origine agricole obtenus selon le mode production biologique.
Pollen biologique
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Trésor de la ruche or Pollen biologique?
Overall, Trésor de la ruche has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Trésor de la ruche has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 356 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Trésor de la ruche has less sugar: 0 g versus 23 g per 100 g.