Stuifmeelkorrels vs Pollen biologique
Overall, Pollen biologique has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Stuifmeelkorrels | Pollen biologique |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 390 kcal | 356 kcal |
| Fat | 7 g | 1.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 2 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 40 g | 23 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 10 g | — |
| Protein | 17 g | 25 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pollen biologique has 81% less fat (1.3 g vs 7 g).
- Pollen biologique has 85% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 2 g).
- Pollen biologique has 43% less sugar (23 g vs 40 g).
- Pollen biologique has 32% more protein (25 g vs 17 g).
- Pollen biologique has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Stuifmeelkorrels
Stuifmeelkorrels
Pollen biologique
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Stuifmeelkorrels or Pollen biologique?
Overall, Pollen biologique has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pollen biologique has fewer calories: 356 kcal versus 390 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pollen biologique has less sugar: 23 g versus 40 g per 100 g.