Comparison

Trésor de la ruche vs Stuifmeelkorrels

Overall, Trésor de la ruche has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientTrésor de la rucheStuifmeelkorrels
Nutri-Score a d
NOVA group 3 —
Calories 0 kcal 390 kcal
Fat 0 g 7 g
Saturated fat 0 g 2 g
Sugars 0 g 40 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber — 10 g
Protein 0 g 17 g
Additives00
AllergensGlutenNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Trésor de la ruche has no calories, while Stuifmeelkorrels has 390 kcal.
  • Trésor de la ruche has no fat, while Stuifmeelkorrels has 7 g.
  • Trésor de la ruche has no saturated fat, while Stuifmeelkorrels has 2 g.
  • Trésor de la ruche has no sugar, while Stuifmeelkorrels has 40 g.
  • Stuifmeelkorrels has 100% more protein (17 g vs 0 g).
  • Trésor de la ruche has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Trésor de la ruche lists: Gluten.

Ingredients

Trésor de la ruche

Eau - Gelée royale** - Sirop de blé** - Miel** - Jus concentré d'orange** (Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck). *Conformément à la Charte Apiculture Responsable. **Ingrédients d'origine agricole obtenus selon le mode production biologique.

Stuifmeelkorrels

Stuifmeelkorrels

FAQ

Which is healthier: Trésor de la ruche or Stuifmeelkorrels?

Overall, Trésor de la ruche has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Trésor de la ruche has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 390 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Trésor de la ruche has less sugar: 0 g versus 40 g per 100 g.

More comparisons