Comparison

Pollen de fleurs en pelote vs Stuifmeelkorrels

Overall, Pollen de fleurs en pelote has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPollen de fleurs en peloteStuifmeelkorrels
Nutri-Score d d
NOVA group 1 —
Calories 394 kcal 390 kcal
Fat 7 g 7 g
Saturated fat 1.5 g 2 g
Sugars 41.6 g 40 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 11.5 g 10 g
Protein 22.8 g 17 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Pollen de fleurs en pelote has 25% less saturated fat (1.5 g vs 2 g).
  • Pollen de fleurs en pelote has 13% more fiber (11.5 g vs 10 g).
  • Pollen de fleurs en pelote has 25% more protein (22.8 g vs 17 g).

Ingredients

Pollen de fleurs en pelote

Pollen de fleurs.

Stuifmeelkorrels

Stuifmeelkorrels

FAQ

Which is healthier: Pollen de fleurs en pelote or Stuifmeelkorrels?

Overall, Pollen de fleurs en pelote has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Stuifmeelkorrels has fewer calories: 390 kcal versus 394 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Stuifmeelkorrels has less sugar: 40 g versus 41.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons