Comparison
Plumas n°3 vs Plumas
Overall, Plumas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Plumas n°3 | Plumas |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 344 kcal | 350 kcal |
| Fat | 2 g | 1.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 3.5 g | 3 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 3 g | 3.5 g |
| Protein | 12 g | 11 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Plumas has 40% less fat (1.2 g vs 2 g).
- Plumas has 14% less sugar (3 g vs 3.5 g).
- Plumas has 14% more fiber (3.5 g vs 3 g).
- Plumas has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Plumas n°3 lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Plumas n°3
Sémola de _trigo_ duro.
Plumas
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Plumas n°3 or Plumas?
Overall, Plumas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Plumas n°3 has fewer calories: 344 kcal versus 350 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Plumas has less sugar: 3 g versus 3.5 g per 100 g.