Comparison

Pleurotes séchées vs Oesterzwammen

Overall, Pleurotes séchées has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.

Better choice
Pleurotes séchées

Pleurotes séchées

· 80 g
a NOVA 1
Oesterzwammen

Oesterzwammen

AH Biologisch · 150 g
a NOVA 1

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPleurotes séchéesOesterzwammen
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group 1 1
Calories 26 kcal 46 kcal
Fat 0.4 g 0.4 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 0.1 g
Sugars 0.7 g 1.1 g
Salt 0 g 0.1 g
Fiber 2.4 g 2.3 g
Protein 3.1 g 3.3 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Pleurotes séchées has 45% fewer calories (26 kcal vs 46 kcal).
  • Pleurotes séchées has 35% less sugar (0.7 g vs 1.1 g).

Ingredients

Pleurotes séchées

Pleurotes séchées

Oesterzwammen

Oesterzwammen

FAQ

Which is healthier: Pleurotes séchées or Oesterzwammen?

Overall, Pleurotes séchées has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Pleurotes séchées has fewer calories: 26 kcal versus 46 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Pleurotes séchées has less sugar: 0.7 g versus 1.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons

Pleurotes séchées vs Champignons à l'huile pl... Pleurote gris frais en b... vs Pleurotes séchées Pleurotes vs Pleurotes séchées Pleurotes séchées vs Pleurotes en Abalones Pleurotes séchées vs Oyster Mushrooms Champignons à l'huile pl... vs Oesterzwammen Pleurote gris frais en b... vs Oesterzwammen Pleurotes vs Oesterzwammen