Comparison

Plain unsweetened ALMOND MILK YOGURT vs Le fantastique brassé myrtille cassis

Overall, Plain unsweetened ALMOND MILK YOGURT has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPlain unsweetened ALMOND MIL...Le fantastique brassé myrtil...
Nutri-Score a c
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 100 kcal 94 kcal
Fat 7.1 g 3 g
Saturated fat 0.6 g 0.3 g
Sugars 0.6 g 9.4 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 1.2 g —
Protein 2.9 g 1.4 g
Additives30
AllergensNutsNuts

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Le fantastique brassé myrtille cassis has 58% less fat (3 g vs 7.1 g).
  • Plain unsweetened ALMOND MILK YOGURT has 94% less sugar (0.6 g vs 9.4 g).
  • Plain unsweetened ALMOND MILK YOGURT has 52% more protein (2.9 g vs 1.4 g).
  • Plain unsweetened ALMOND MILK YOGURT has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Plain unsweetened ALMOND MILK YOGURT

Almond milk (water, almonds), locust bean gum, xanthan gum, agar, live active cultures: s.thermophilus, l bulgaricus lacidophilus and bifidobacteria.

Le fantastique brassé myrtille cassis

Lait d'AMANDE 73% (eau, AMANDE 5,4%), fruits 12% (myrtille 6,4%, cassis 5,6%), sucre, amidon, jus de citron concentré, citrates de calcium, épaississant : farine de graines de caroube, arômes naturels, ferments. Peut contenir du SOJA et d'autres FRUITS À COQUE.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Plain unsweetened ALMOND MILK YOGURT or Le fantastique brassé myrtille cassis?

Overall, Plain unsweetened ALMOND MILK YOGURT has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Le fantastique brassé myrtille cassis has fewer calories: 94 kcal versus 100 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Plain unsweetened ALMOND MILK YOGURT has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 9.4 g per 100 g.

More comparisons