Le fantastique brassé myrtille cassis vs Brassé amande Alevia
Overall, Le fantastique brassé myrtille cassis has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Le fantastique brassé myrtille cassis
Brassé amande Alevia
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Le fantastique brassé myrtil... | Brassé amande Alevia |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 94 kcal | 115 kcal |
| Fat | 3 g | 10 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 6.1 g |
| Sugars | 9.4 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 1.4 g | 1.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | Nuts | Nuts |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Le fantastique brassé myrtille cassis has 18% fewer calories (94 kcal vs 115 kcal).
- Le fantastique brassé myrtille cassis has 70% less fat (3 g vs 10 g).
- Le fantastique brassé myrtille cassis has 95% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 6.1 g).
- Brassé amande Alevia has 95% less sugar (0.5 g vs 9.4 g).
Ingredients
Le fantastique brassé myrtille cassis
Lait d'AMANDE 73% (eau, AMANDE 5,4%), fruits 12% (myrtille 6,4%, cassis 5,6%), sucre, amidon, jus de citron concentré, citrates de calcium, épaississant : farine de graines de caroube, arômes naturels, ferments. Peut contenir du SOJA et d'autres FRUITS À COQUE.
Brassé amande Alevia
eau, purée d'amande 7%, huile de coco, amidon de tapioca, épaississants : gomme tara et fibre d'agrumes, ferments.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Le fantastique brassé myrtille cassis or Brassé amande Alevia?
Overall, Le fantastique brassé myrtille cassis has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Le fantastique brassé myrtille cassis has fewer calories: 94 kcal versus 115 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Brassé amande Alevia has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 9.4 g per 100 g.