Comparison

Piña en rodajas 100% natural vs Œufs de Lompe du Groenland

Overall, Piña en rodajas 100% natural has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPiña en rodajas 100% naturalŒufs de Lompe du Groenland
Nutri-Score b e
NOVA group — 4
Calories 67 kcal 79 kcal
Fat 0 g 3.5 g
Saturated fat 0 g 1.3 g
Sugars 9.2 g 0.5 g
Salt 0 g 4 g
Fiber — 0 g
Protein 0.5 g 11 g
Additives06
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Piña en rodajas 100% natural has 15% fewer calories (67 kcal vs 79 kcal).
  • Piña en rodajas 100% natural has no fat, while Œufs de Lompe du Groenland has 3.5 g.
  • Piña en rodajas 100% natural has no saturated fat, while Œufs de Lompe du Groenland has 1.3 g.
  • Œufs de Lompe du Groenland has 95% less sugar (0.5 g vs 9.2 g).
  • Piña en rodajas 100% natural has no salt, while Œufs de Lompe du Groenland has 4 g.
  • Œufs de Lompe du Groenland has 95% more protein (11 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Piña en rodajas 100% natural has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Piña en rodajas 100% natural

Not available.

Œufs de Lompe du Groenland

Oeufs de Lompe (Cyclopterus lumpus) 84%, eau, sel, stabilisants: E422, E415, colorants: E141, F150d, E163, E151, conservateur: E211. 5" 740301 175667

FAQ

Which is healthier: Piña en rodajas 100% natural or Œufs de Lompe du Groenland?

Overall, Piña en rodajas 100% natural has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Piña en rodajas 100% natural has fewer calories: 67 kcal versus 79 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Œufs de Lompe du Groenland has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 9.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons