Comparison

Piña deshidratada vs Piña deshidratada

Overall, Piña deshidratada has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPiña deshidratadaPiña deshidratada
Nutri-Score d —
NOVA group 3 1
Calories 323 kcal 314 kcal
Fat 0.4 g 0.8 g
Saturated fat 0.2 g 0 g
Sugars 56.1 g 62 g
Salt 0.2 g 0 g
Fiber 7.1 g 9.4 g
Protein 2.3 g 3.4 g
Additives10
AllergensSulphur dioxide and sulphitesNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Piña deshidratada has 50% less fat (0.4 g vs 0.8 g).
  • Piña deshidratada has 24% more fiber (9.4 g vs 7.1 g).
  • Piña deshidratada has 32% more protein (3.4 g vs 2.3 g).
  • Piña deshidratada is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Piña deshidratada lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.

Ingredients

Piña deshidratada

Piña deshidratada, antioxidante: dióxido de azufre, fécula de patata 0.5%. Puede contener trazas de cacahuetes y frutos de cáscara.

Piña deshidratada

Piña deshidratada.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Piña deshidratada or Piña deshidratada?

Overall, Piña deshidratada has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Piña deshidratada has fewer calories: 314 kcal versus 323 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Piña deshidratada has less sugar: 56.1 g versus 62 g per 100 g.

More comparisons