Comparison
Piens vs Ekoloģisks piens 2.5%
Overall, Piens has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Piens | Ekoloģisks piens 2.5% |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 49 kcal | 54 kcal |
| Fat | 2 g | 2.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.4 g | 1.5 g |
| Sugars | 4.5 g | 4.7 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 3.2 g | 3.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Piens has 20% less fat (2 g vs 2.5 g).
Ingredients
Piens
_PIENS_ 2%
Ekoloģisks piens 2.5%
ekoloģisks pasterizēts _piens_
FAQ
Which is healthier: Piens or Ekoloģisks piens 2.5%?
Overall, Piens has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Piens has fewer calories: 49 kcal versus 54 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Piens has less sugar: 4.5 g versus 4.7 g per 100 g.