Comparison
Piens vs 3.5% piens, pasterizēts
Overall, Piens has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Piens | 3.5% piens, pasterizēts |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 49 kcal | 63 kcal |
| Fat | 2 g | 3.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.4 g | 2.3 g |
| Sugars | 4.5 g | 4.7 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 3.2 g | 3.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Pilnpiens |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Piens has 22% fewer calories (49 kcal vs 63 kcal).
- Piens has 43% less fat (2 g vs 3.5 g).
- Piens has 39% less saturated fat (1.4 g vs 2.3 g).
- Only Piens lists: Milk.
- Only 3.5% piens, pasterizēts lists: Pilnpiens.
Ingredients
Piens
_PIENS_ 2%
3.5% piens, pasterizēts
_Pilnpiens_, 3,5 % tauku. Pasterizēts.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Piens or 3.5% piens, pasterizēts?
Overall, Piens has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Piens has fewer calories: 49 kcal versus 63 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Piens has less sugar: 4.5 g versus 4.7 g per 100 g.