Comparison
3.5% piens, pasterizēts vs Protein Shake
Overall, Protein Shake has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | 3.5% piens, pasterizēts | Protein Shake |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | — |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 63 kcal | 69 kcal |
| Fat | 3.5 g | 0.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.3 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 4.7 g | 5.1 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | — |
| Fiber | — | 0.8 g |
| Protein | 3.2 g | 7.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Pilnpiens | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Protein Shake has 90% less fat (0.4 g vs 3.5 g).
- Protein Shake has 91% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 2.3 g).
- Protein Shake has 58% more protein (7.6 g vs 3.2 g).
- Only 3.5% piens, pasterizēts lists: Pilnpiens.
Ingredients
3.5% piens, pasterizēts
_Pilnpiens_, 3,5 % tauku. Pasterizēts.
Protein Shake
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: 3.5% piens, pasterizēts or Protein Shake?
Overall, Protein Shake has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
3.5% piens, pasterizēts has fewer calories: 63 kcal versus 69 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
3.5% piens, pasterizēts has less sugar: 4.7 g versus 5.1 g per 100 g.