Comparison
Piens "alma" vs 3.5% piens, pasterizēts
Overall, Piens "alma" has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Piens "alma" | 3.5% piens, pasterizēts |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 55 kcal | 63 kcal |
| Fat | 2.5 g | 3.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.7 g | 2.3 g |
| Sugars | 4.8 g | 4.7 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 3.2 g | 3.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Pilnpiens |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Piens "alma" has 13% fewer calories (55 kcal vs 63 kcal).
- Piens "alma" has 29% less fat (2.5 g vs 3.5 g).
- Piens "alma" has 26% less saturated fat (1.7 g vs 2.3 g).
- Only 3.5% piens, pasterizēts lists: Pilnpiens.
Ingredients
Piens "alma"
Not available.
3.5% piens, pasterizēts
_Pilnpiens_, 3,5 % tauku. Pasterizēts.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Piens "alma" or 3.5% piens, pasterizēts?
Overall, Piens "alma" has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Piens "alma" has fewer calories: 55 kcal versus 63 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
3.5% piens, pasterizēts has less sugar: 4.7 g versus 4.8 g per 100 g.