Comparison
Piens "alma" vs Ekoloģisks piens 2.5%
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Piens "alma" | Ekoloģisks piens 2.5% |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 55 kcal | 54 kcal |
| Fat | 2.5 g | 2.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.7 g | 1.5 g |
| Sugars | 4.8 g | 4.7 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 3.2 g | 3.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Only Ekoloģisks piens 2.5% lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Piens "alma"
Not available.
Ekoloģisks piens 2.5%
ekoloģisks pasterizēts _piens_
FAQ
Which is healthier: Piens "alma" or Ekoloģisks piens 2.5%?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Ekoloģisks piens 2.5% has fewer calories: 54 kcal versus 55 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Ekoloģisks piens 2.5% has less sugar: 4.7 g versus 4.8 g per 100 g.