Comparison

Piada sfogliata vs High Protein Wraps

Overall, High Protein Wraps has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPiada sfogliataHigh Protein Wraps
Nutri-Score d a
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 311 kcal 293 kcal
Fat 9.4 g 7 g
Saturated fat 3.9 g 1.4 g
Sugars 3.1 g 1.5 g
Salt 1.6 g 1.1 g
Fiber 4.3 g 6 g
Protein 7.4 g 18 g
Additives08
AllergensGlutenGluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • High Protein Wraps has 26% less fat (7 g vs 9.4 g).
  • High Protein Wraps has 64% less saturated fat (1.4 g vs 3.9 g).
  • High Protein Wraps has 52% less sugar (1.5 g vs 3.1 g).
  • High Protein Wraps has 33% less salt (1.1 g vs 1.6 g).
  • High Protein Wraps has 28% more fiber (6 g vs 4.3 g).
  • High Protein Wraps has 59% more protein (18 g vs 7.4 g).
  • High Protein Wraps has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Piada sfogliata is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Piada sfogliata

61% farine de blé, eau, 9% saindoux, sel de cuisine, 1,4% alcool éthylique, levure de bière.

High Protein Wraps

55% Weizenvollkornmehl, Wasser, Weizengluten, Rapsöl, Feuchthaltemittel: Glycerin; Reiseiweißisolat, Erbseneiweißisolat, Speisesalz, Backtriebmittel: Natriumcarbonate; Emulgator: Mono - und Diglyceride von Speisefettsäuren; Säureregulator: Citronensäure; Stabilisator: Xanthan; Konservierungsstoffe: Calciumpropionat, Kaliumsorbat; Mehlbehandlungsmittel: L-Cystein.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Piada sfogliata or High Protein Wraps?

Overall, High Protein Wraps has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

High Protein Wraps has fewer calories: 293 kcal versus 311 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

High Protein Wraps has less sugar: 1.5 g versus 3.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons