Comparison
Physalis getrocknet vs Physalis
Overall, Physalis getrocknet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Physalis getrocknet | Physalis |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 300 kcal | 329 kcal |
| Fat | 4.7 g | 6.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.6 g | 0.7 g |
| Sugars | 38.5 g | 40 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 24.3 g | 21 g |
| Protein | 6.7 g | 7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Physalis getrocknet has 29% less fat (4.7 g vs 6.6 g).
- Physalis getrocknet has 14% more fiber (24.3 g vs 21 g).
Ingredients
Physalis getrocknet
Physalis, getrocknet
Physalis
physalis
FAQ
Which is healthier: Physalis getrocknet or Physalis?
Overall, Physalis getrocknet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Physalis getrocknet has fewer calories: 300 kcal versus 329 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Physalis getrocknet has less sugar: 38.5 g versus 40 g per 100 g.