Physalis vs Physalis getrocknet
Overall, Physalis getrocknet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Physalis | Physalis getrocknet |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 337 kcal | 300 kcal |
| Fat | 6.9 g | 4.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.8 g | 0.6 g |
| Sugars | 36.4 g | 38.5 g |
| Salt | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 26.9 g | 24.3 g |
| Protein | 7.2 g | 6.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Physalis getrocknet has 11% fewer calories (300 kcal vs 337 kcal).
- Physalis getrocknet has 32% less fat (4.7 g vs 6.9 g).
- Physalis getrocknet has 98% less salt (0 g vs 0.5 g).
Ingredients
Physalis
100% de physalis (Pr viana) biologiques de qualité supérie Origine : Pérou. 0,5g 0,2g 52,6mg 21mg (26,2% AR*) Idée recette Agde référence pour un adulte type (8400 kJ /
Physalis getrocknet
Physalis, getrocknet
FAQ
Which is healthier: Physalis or Physalis getrocknet?
Overall, Physalis getrocknet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Physalis getrocknet has fewer calories: 300 kcal versus 337 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Physalis has less sugar: 36.4 g versus 38.5 g per 100 g.