Comparison
Physalis getrocknet vs Physalis
Overall, Physalis has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Physalis getrocknet | Physalis |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 300 kcal | 172 kcal |
| Fat | 4.7 g | 11.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.6 g | 3.6 g |
| Sugars | 38.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 24.3 g | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 6.7 g | 17.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Physalis has 43% fewer calories (172 kcal vs 300 kcal).
- Physalis getrocknet has 59% less fat (4.7 g vs 11.5 g).
- Physalis getrocknet has 83% less saturated fat (0.6 g vs 3.6 g).
- Physalis has 99% less sugar (0.5 g vs 38.5 g).
- Physalis getrocknet has 98% more fiber (24.3 g vs 0.5 g).
- Physalis has 61% more protein (17.1 g vs 6.7 g).
- Physalis has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Physalis getrocknet
Physalis, getrocknet
Physalis
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Physalis getrocknet or Physalis?
Overall, Physalis has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Physalis has fewer calories: 172 kcal versus 300 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Physalis has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 38.5 g per 100 g.