Peri Peri Seasoning (Coarse) vs Garlic bag
Overall, Garlic bag has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Peri Peri Seasoning (Coarse) | Garlic bag |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 258 kcal | 79 kcal |
| Fat | 9 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.7 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 8.7 g | 1.9 g |
| Salt | 0.8 g | 0.3 g |
| Fiber | 24.3 g | — |
| Protein | 10.8 g | 9.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Garlic bag has 69% fewer calories (79 kcal vs 258 kcal).
- Garlic bag has 94% less fat (0.5 g vs 9 g).
- Garlic bag has 94% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 1.7 g).
- Garlic bag has 78% less sugar (1.9 g vs 8.7 g).
- Garlic bag has 66% less salt (0.3 g vs 0.8 g).
- Garlic bag has the better Nutri-Score.
- Peri Peri Seasoning (Coarse) is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Peri Peri Seasoning (Coarse)
Paprika, chilli, black pepper, cayenne, dried onion, dried garlic, salt, herbs, bay, basil, lemon oil.
Garlic bag
vegetables (potato, tomato, onion (8,5%), parsnip), garlic (24%), table salt, sugar, herbs and spices (parsley (2,5%), black pepper, paprika, ginger, coriander, marjoram, cayenne chili pepper), maize starch, sunflower oil, vinegar, beetroot concentrate, lemon juice concentrate, flavouring, may contain traces of wheat, eggs, soya, milk, celery and mustard, carefully blended by us bag
FAQ
Which is healthier: Peri Peri Seasoning (Coarse) or Garlic bag?
Overall, Garlic bag has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Garlic bag has fewer calories: 79 kcal versus 258 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Garlic bag has less sugar: 1.9 g versus 8.7 g per 100 g.