Pate de oca vs Mousse de pato
Overall, Pate de oca has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pate de oca | Mousse de pato |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 346 kcal | 482 kcal |
| Fat | 35 g | 47 g |
| Saturated fat | 14 g | 16 g |
| Sugars | 0.9 g | 1.7 g |
| Salt | 1.7 g | 2 g |
| Protein | 5.5 g | 9.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 5 |
| Allergens | None listed | Eggs, Milk, Mustard |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pate de oca has 28% fewer calories (346 kcal vs 482 kcal).
- Pate de oca has 26% less fat (35 g vs 47 g).
- Pate de oca has 13% less saturated fat (14 g vs 16 g).
- Pate de oca has 47% less sugar (0.9 g vs 1.7 g).
- Pate de oca has 15% less salt (1.7 g vs 2 g).
- Mousse de pato has 44% more protein (9.9 g vs 5.5 g).
- Only Mousse de pato lists: Eggs, Milk, Mustard.
Ingredients
Pate de oca
Not available.
Mousse de pato
92% Paté: gordura de porco, 20% figado de pato, 15% carne de porco, 10% figado de frango, gordura de palo, leite, ovo, acidificante: E262, E325; açucar, sal nitrificado (sal, conservante: E250), farinha de arroz, Conhaque, Madelra, especiarias (mostarda), colagénio de porco, aroma natural, puré de tomate, antioxidante: E300, F330; dextrose, 8% Decoração: gordura de pato, corante E161b. Pode conter frutos de casca rija.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pate de oca or Mousse de pato?
Overall, Pate de oca has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pate de oca has fewer calories: 346 kcal versus 482 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pate de oca has less sugar: 0.9 g versus 1.7 g per 100 g.