Patatas artesanas al estilo tradicional vs Chips nature
Overall, Chips nature has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Patatas artesanas al estilo tradicional
Chips nature
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Patatas artesanas al estilo... | Chips nature |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 554 kcal | 518 kcal |
| Fat | 36.2 g | 34 g |
| Saturated fat | 5.6 g | 2.8 g |
| Sugars | 0.8 g | 0.6 g |
| Salt | 0.8 g | 0.9 g |
| Fiber | 7.5 g | 4.5 g |
| Protein | 5 g | 5.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Chips nature has 50% less saturated fat (2.8 g vs 5.6 g).
- Patatas artesanas al estilo tradicional has 40% more fiber (7.5 g vs 4.5 g).
- Chips nature has 15% more protein (5.9 g vs 5 g).
Ingredients
Patatas artesanas al estilo tradicional
Patatas, aceite de oliva y sal.
Chips nature
Pommes de terre 65,4%, huiles végétales (tournesol, colza en proportions variables), sel Traces éventuelles de lait, arachides.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Patatas artesanas al estilo tradicional or Chips nature?
Overall, Chips nature has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Chips nature has fewer calories: 518 kcal versus 554 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Chips nature has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 0.8 g per 100 g.