Comparison

Chips nature vs Patatas artesanas al estilo tradicional

Overall, Chips nature has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientChips naturePatatas artesanas al estilo...
Nutri-Score d c
NOVA group — 3
Calories 527 kcal 554 kcal
Fat 31 g 36.2 g
Saturated fat 2.5 g 5.6 g
Sugars 0.5 g 0.8 g
Salt 1.2 g 0.8 g
Fiber — 7.5 g
Protein 6.1 g 5 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Chips nature has 14% less fat (31 g vs 36.2 g).
  • Chips nature has 55% less saturated fat (2.5 g vs 5.6 g).
  • Chips nature has 38% less sugar (0.5 g vs 0.8 g).
  • Patatas artesanas al estilo tradicional has 31% less salt (0.8 g vs 1.2 g).
  • Chips nature has 18% more protein (6.1 g vs 5 g).
  • Patatas artesanas al estilo tradicional has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Chips nature

Not available.

Patatas artesanas al estilo tradicional

Patatas, aceite de oliva y sal.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Chips nature or Patatas artesanas al estilo tradicional?

Overall, Chips nature has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Chips nature has fewer calories: 527 kcal versus 554 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Chips nature has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons