Chips nature vs Patatas artesanas al estilo tradicional
Overall, Chips nature has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chips nature | Patatas artesanas al estilo... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 527 kcal | 554 kcal |
| Fat | 31 g | 36.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.5 g | 5.6 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.8 g |
| Salt | 1.2 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | — | 7.5 g |
| Protein | 6.1 g | 5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Chips nature has 14% less fat (31 g vs 36.2 g).
- Chips nature has 55% less saturated fat (2.5 g vs 5.6 g).
- Chips nature has 38% less sugar (0.5 g vs 0.8 g).
- Patatas artesanas al estilo tradicional has 31% less salt (0.8 g vs 1.2 g).
- Chips nature has 18% more protein (6.1 g vs 5 g).
- Patatas artesanas al estilo tradicional has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Chips nature
Not available.
Patatas artesanas al estilo tradicional
Patatas, aceite de oliva y sal.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chips nature or Patatas artesanas al estilo tradicional?
Overall, Chips nature has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Chips nature has fewer calories: 527 kcal versus 554 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Chips nature has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.8 g per 100 g.