Comparison
Chips nature vs Patatas fritas
Overall, Chips nature has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chips nature | Patatas fritas |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 527 kcal | 493 kcal |
| Fat | 31 g | 26.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.5 g | 3.3 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.6 g |
| Salt | 1.2 g | 2 g |
| Fiber | — | 5.1 g |
| Protein | 6.1 g | 6.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Patatas fritas has 15% less fat (26.2 g vs 31 g).
- Chips nature has 24% less saturated fat (2.5 g vs 3.3 g).
- Chips nature has 40% less salt (1.2 g vs 2 g).
Ingredients
Chips nature
Not available.
Patatas fritas
Patatas, aceites vegetales (maíz, girasol alto oleico) en proporción variable, sal,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chips nature or Patatas fritas?
Overall, Chips nature has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Patatas fritas has fewer calories: 493 kcal versus 527 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Chips nature has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.6 g per 100 g.