Comparison

Pastel de centollo vs Paté ibérico al Pedro Ximénez con pasa

Overall, Pastel de centollo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPastel de centolloPaté ibérico al Pedro Ximéne...
Nutri-Score d d
NOVA group — —
Calories 136 kcal 164 kcal
Fat 10.2 g 6.6 g
Saturated fat 4.7 g 1.1 g
Sugars 0.1 g 4.1 g
Salt 1.3 g 2.5 g
Protein 8.1 g 4.7 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Pastel de centollo has 17% fewer calories (136 kcal vs 164 kcal).
  • Paté ibérico al Pedro Ximénez con pasa has 35% less fat (6.6 g vs 10.2 g).
  • Paté ibérico al Pedro Ximénez con pasa has 77% less saturated fat (1.1 g vs 4.7 g).
  • Pastel de centollo has 98% less sugar (0.1 g vs 4.1 g).
  • Pastel de centollo has 48% less salt (1.3 g vs 2.5 g).
  • Pastel de centollo has 42% more protein (8.1 g vs 4.7 g).

Ingredients

Pastel de centollo

Not available.

Paté ibérico al Pedro Ximénez con pasa

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Pastel de centollo or Paté ibérico al Pedro Ximénez con pasa?

Overall, Pastel de centollo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Pastel de centollo has fewer calories: 136 kcal versus 164 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Pastel de centollo has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 4.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons