Pastel de centollo vs Paté ibérico al Pedro Ximénez con pasa
Overall, Pastel de centollo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Pastel de centollo
Paté ibérico al Pedro Ximénez con pasa
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pastel de centollo | Paté ibérico al Pedro Ximéne... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 136 kcal | 164 kcal |
| Fat | 10.2 g | 6.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 4.7 g | 1.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.1 g | 4.1 g |
| Salt | 1.3 g | 2.5 g |
| Protein | 8.1 g | 4.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pastel de centollo has 17% fewer calories (136 kcal vs 164 kcal).
- Paté ibérico al Pedro Ximénez con pasa has 35% less fat (6.6 g vs 10.2 g).
- Paté ibérico al Pedro Ximénez con pasa has 77% less saturated fat (1.1 g vs 4.7 g).
- Pastel de centollo has 98% less sugar (0.1 g vs 4.1 g).
- Pastel de centollo has 48% less salt (1.3 g vs 2.5 g).
- Pastel de centollo has 42% more protein (8.1 g vs 4.7 g).
Ingredients
Pastel de centollo
Not available.
Paté ibérico al Pedro Ximénez con pasa
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pastel de centollo or Paté ibérico al Pedro Ximénez con pasa?
Overall, Pastel de centollo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pastel de centollo has fewer calories: 136 kcal versus 164 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pastel de centollo has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 4.1 g per 100 g.