Comparison
Pasta di kamut vs Pasta turanicum
Overall, Pasta di kamut has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pasta di kamut | Pasta turanicum |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 350 kcal | 336 kcal |
| Fat | 1.3 g | 1.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 0.4 g |
| Sugars | 4.3 g | 2.2 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 3 g | 3 g |
| Protein | 14 g | 11 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pasta di kamut has 32% less fat (1.3 g vs 1.9 g).
- Pasta turanicum has 49% less sugar (2.2 g vs 4.3 g).
- Pasta di kamut has 21% more protein (14 g vs 11 g).
Ingredients
Pasta di kamut
Not available.
Pasta turanicum
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pasta di kamut or Pasta turanicum?
Overall, Pasta di kamut has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pasta turanicum has fewer calories: 336 kcal versus 350 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pasta turanicum has less sugar: 2.2 g versus 4.3 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Kamut farfalline n°28 vs Pasta turanicum
Fusillon khoradan vs Pasta turanicum
Khorasan kamut spaghetti vs Pasta turanicum
Spaghetti di kamut vs Pasta turanicum
Pasta di kamut vs Pasta de trigo kamut eco...
Pasta de trigo kamut eco... vs Pasta turanicum
Pasta di kamut vs Fusilli turanicum
Pasta di kamut vs Kamut farfalline n°28