Comparison
Pasta di kamut vs Kamut farfalline n°28
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pasta di kamut | Kamut farfalline n°28 |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | — |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 350 kcal | 358 kcal |
| Fat | 1.3 g | 1.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 0.4 g |
| Sugars | 4.3 g | 2 g |
| Salt | 0 g | — |
| Fiber | 3 g | — |
| Protein | 14 g | 14 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pasta di kamut has 24% less fat (1.3 g vs 1.7 g).
- Kamut farfalline n°28 has 53% less sugar (2 g vs 4.3 g).
Ingredients
Pasta di kamut
Not available.
Kamut farfalline n°28
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pasta di kamut or Kamut farfalline n°28?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pasta di kamut has fewer calories: 350 kcal versus 358 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kamut farfalline n°28 has less sugar: 2 g versus 4.3 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Kamut farfalline n°28 vs Pasta turanicum
Fusillon khoradan vs Kamut farfalline n°28
Kamut farfalline n°28 vs Khorasan kamut spaghetti
Spaghetti di kamut vs Kamut farfalline n°28
Pasta di kamut vs Pasta de trigo kamut eco...
Kamut farfalline n°28 vs Pasta de trigo kamut eco...
Pasta di kamut vs Fusilli turanicum
Pasta di kamut vs Pasta turanicum